The European Qualifications Framework (EQF) has
a competitive advantage in the global marketplace because it signals a more
balanced approach to qualifications and it addresses what I think is a systemic
issue in education and training.
The EQF seeks to balance input qualifications
with output qualifications and to focus on vocational qualifications that are
considered vital to sustain a competitive advantage.
Output qualifications are called learning
outcomes which are defined “ as a statement of what a learner knows,
understands and is able to do on completion of a learning process.
The EQF emphasizes the results of learning
rather than focusing on inputs such as length of study.
For example, when one of my children was sick,
he was in a teaching hospital with many doctors seeking to obtain additional
specialist’s qualifications. I noticed
that one doctor from Egypt, who could not speak English very well, was the one who was front and
center in any crisis. It turns out his knowledge, skills and competence in emergency
surgeries surpassed any of the other doctors.
All the doctors had high entry academic qualifications
(inputs), but our Egyptian friend had, in my opinion, better learning outcomes (surgery in
emergency situations).
I chose him and that decision saved my son’s
life.
I always thought that many people are better
able to learn by doing than learn by listening.
As a teacher I found that a certain portion of
every class did well regardless of teachers, subject or grade level. Another portion
of the class struggled regardless of teachers, subject or grade level.
Research revealed that learning style was
critical. In very simple terms, some people learn by listening and studying
while others learn by seeing and doing.
The ones who learned by listening and studying
invariably did better on academics and did well in a society that emphasizes academic
qualifications.
The ones who learn by seeing and doing
struggled in academics but did better on vocational pursuits.
The problem is that, in my opinion, the
academic qualifications were perceived as better than vocational
qualifications. This created a systemic class distinction that in my neighborhood
was known as blue collar and while collar jobs and rewards.
The EQF will relate different countries’
national qualifications systems and frameworks together around a common
European reference – its eight reference levels. (We will look at these in upcoming posts.)
The EQF has many advantages in helping address
these two issues
- It will make it easier for learners to
describe their broad level of competence to employers in other countries.
- There will be a common reference point, which will
indicate how learning outcomes may be combined from different settings, for
example formal study or work, and from different countries, and can thus
contribute to reducing barriers between education and training providers.
- The focus on learning outcomes will make it
easier to assess whether learning outcomes acquired in work settings are
equivalent in content and relevance to formal qualifications.
- The adoption of a common reference framework
based on learning outcomes will facilitate the comparison and (potential)
linking together of traditional qualifications awarded by national authorities
and qualifications awarded by other stakeholders.
The EQF will thus help sectors and individuals
take advantage of this growing field of foreign credential recognition.
© 2009 All Rights Reserved, Douglas
Ross, Principle Dynamics Consulting Inc.


Comments